Видео

Php has more jobs than rust

What rust needs is another higher level language which would generate current rust code.

Rust looks like what you would see if you looked at c++ code really drunk or high.

I took a look at rust. Come on guys what are you smoking? It looks like c++ haphazardly redesigned by someone high on mushrooms.

6:50 error on assigning the None it looks like this error only for the newer version of rust

I don't think that something deserves to be hated, unless they devs wanted to. Rust is like a school teacher that guides you thru all the way of sys development and make sure that you are not shooting in your leg. It's cool that you need to think differently because of borrowing, and other stuff. But why? It's not even faster than C/C++. So what the point? C++ has deallocation (destructors) and Java/Python and other Runtime languages (VM's) has garbage collectors. Of course Java/Python not fast enough as Rust/C cuz simply garbage collector takes time. But hey. Choose what you like or need, rather what is your religion. (IMHO)

that pricing is VERY good! too good even. I'll definitely try this out

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

May I ask how long it took you to learn through this journey?

I've forgotten more languages than most people learn, and I have to tell you, the learning curve on Rust is really steep. And I used Lisp in the late 90s. I am also old which isnt helping a lot.

Rust is bloated and complex, so its memory safety while not using a GC is not good enough to justify the effort required to write serious software unless the company really have the time and money. other than memory safety(which can be "escaped" with unsafe rust) there are all bunch of bugs that can happen in Rust like all other languages. It's fast and don't have a GC, so what? Swift don't have a GC too. the borrow checker is a nightmare to use, killing productivity, not to mention all the foot guns that comes with it, which can be a show stopper when using the wrong architecture. sorry, it's just over-hyped soy boy trash language, which will be forgotten once a "simpler" memory safe low level language will be adopted. Zig is one candidate.

Rust?! Wots That Then!? 😁 LOL! Social media NEVER fails to amuse me... One day... New languages like Rust... Are the new shit hot!... Then next, they're not! I'm an 8-bit era Dude so I established my software foundations decades ago! Thus new languages are beneath me! Why reinvent the wheel, when C... And C like languages STILL dominate?! Anyway, my major concern is for new developers... They MUST be confused as heck!!! And with CRAZED individuals promoting AI to replace them... I'm even MORE confused about how we are going to develop the systems needed for the future! AI? NOPE!!! AGI maybe... And if... When... That happens... Then it will be interesting to see how Capitalism will work... When Human Beings become redundant! I can't wait!!! 😁

What do you think about mojo?

Good stuff. The chapter in the Rust book needs this sort of example-based explanation as well as comparisons to other languages lol

Hot take: The reason it's hard to write a linked list in safe Rust is because it's really hard to write a fully correct implementation of linked list. Also, does it really matter when there's a standard library linked list?

Rustrover is quite good, just needs performance improvements. I plan to use it more over time

18:43 LOL even their reps dismiss the 'suggestions'

Thank you for this tutorail, tried running loop in different languages rust is way faster than every other languages !

C syntax is simpler than rust!!!🥲 I want rust with more C-like syntax

Love how Rust is supposed to never have runtime errors, but doesn't even check matrix dimensions for multiplications at compile time. Or how you have to write lifetimes which completely defeats the purpose of having scopes 😅😅

Rust has opened up my eyes to the dangers of inner mutibility -- and holding references to other objects in general. I have had to unlearn some seriously bad habits I picked up from languages where this is easy.

RustRover is pretty good and free for non-commercial use. I won't use M$ Code because I don't like spyware.

Great content Bogdan !

What is a Shtring?

Free for 1 YEAR only :)

Hi, can you make series on poem framework of rust? Lack of resource availability is major concern and first obstacle to get started with it. Thanks :)

the way rust is safe, rhe way the compiler generates a horribly weird assembler

the way rust is safe, rhe way the compiler generates a horribly weird assembler

"Rust is more verbose because of static typing" -- but it's also much more verbose as C, C++, C#, or Java, which are also statically typed. 🙂 The extreme verbosity of Rust seems to stem from trying to have it all: performance and safety. C and C++ offer the same performance as Rust, but not the safety. C# and Java are as safe or safer than Rust, but can't reach the same level of performance since they hide some low-level details. I'll have to really dive into Rust some time to get a proper feeling for the language, but I suspect that this coupling of performance and safety is unnecessary for the vast majority of programmers. Only a very small number of programmers (relatively speaking) write code that's critical for people's livelihood. Most code is ultimately just written for entertainment, or optimizing productivity in various fields of business that aren't life-critical.

Yo, I wanna learn Rust, but I only know C, not C++. Everyone in the comments is talking about C++, and it's making me a bit nervous.

JetBrains IDEs are gorgeous and now one of them dedicated to Rust... it'll be a delightful experience 🤩. Congrats to JetBrains!

is this guy ai generated?

Rust rose to dominance in rewrites of shell utilities. When it comes to large systems, it's a mere whimper.

Is it good to be interested in Zig also and should one learn it

If you want to hate some language because of hype, hate Haskell. Haskell fans seem to think that Haskell is practically perfect language because it's so close to pure mathematics. However, when you start to actually use Haskell, you'll quickly hit the problem that Haskell hasn't even decided on storage for strings. They have type String which is in the core of the language but you cannot use it for real because it wastes so much memory (like 64 bytes per character of text). Then you have Text which is not compatible with String and you have to do explicit conversion back and forth every time you want to call some core function but cannot afford 64x memory usage overhead. And Text cannot hold random binary data so you also have multiple implementations of different binary safe string types with different overheads and type signatures. Meanwhile even PHP has a single binary safe string type that supports UNICODE and very minimal RAM overhead.

I would say you *have to use Rust* if you want to write multithreaded code that uses writable shared memory blocks because Rust is the only language that can avoid data races between threads. If you only write single threaded code and Go is fast enough, you should probably use Go. C and C++ allow writing code that runs equally fast with Rust but nobody seems to be careful enough to write bug-free C or C++. For example, see the Linux kernel. Linux kernel developers are probably among the most careful C programmers in the world and still Linux kernel often contains memory safety issues and data races. If you're writing code for systems where performance doesn't matter or data corruption doesn't matter, sure go with whatever language you like the most.

Thank you for making this. It's so helpful and so easy to follow along. You're amazing

When an Ariane rocket misfired everyone and their cousin asserted that the software bug wouldn't have hsppened with THEIR language/methodology/toolchain/etc. Just saying.

Why when he started about ownership there was instantly a black guy on the screen

I see comments on here that complaining that Rust is only for people who like to get told what to do. So close-minded. Rather, It simply doesn't let you write unreliable or faulty code. Maybe Rust is mainly for people who aren't lazy and care about having full control of robust and efficient code? Seems to me that's it's whole goal.

I think you're part of the problem lmfao I've never personally seen any hate on rust but if it's anything, then it's all the hyperbolic statements about rust. For me personally, rust is everything it was advertized as - performant, low level access with the ease of use of java or any old garbage collected language. I love it for that. That doesn't mean everyone wants that though. I get that the stuff like "you should write everything in rust" is a joke but you can't honestly expect people to take it in good faith if you make light of their emotions and opinions like that. I like rust. Here's why I like it. but never: You should too.

The Nil variant in my project is 4 bytes ☹

I am starting this video and determined to get a job within a year in rust !!! I know may be its too much but lets try !!! I will comeback someday with some good news.

If you're watching in June 2024 or later, You might need dependency: rand = "0.8.5" It no longer supports double comma separated arguments. Only gen_range(low..high) and gen_range(low..=high) are supported. Notice the dots and equal signs. No commas.

wasnt there a new video about git something? where did that end up?

Hi I'm a new beginner and I'm not sure how you start your project directory

Excellent demo!

Great tutorials. Can you list down or make a video on which extensions do you use in VSCode for Rust. Many thanks in advance

In the video it is mentioned that the Boing 737 MAX accidents have been Software failures. Which is not correct. The reason was a system design failure with not having redundancy for a faulty sensor. The software did what it should have done. That is a huge different.

You're not answering the question why developers hate Rust. Instead this is an apologetic rant committing the curve fallacy and promoting it with marketdroid arguments. Once upon a time (c:a 2014) node.js was the superfantastic future. Now it is just another programming language with some organizational problems.